Posted by: Andy Rice | 9 November 2007

Cat gets run over by keelboat

There will be no multihull in the Weymouth 2012 Olympics. But there will be Women’s Match Racing in place of the Women’s Fleet Racing.

Following a tense ISAF Council meeting in Estoril this morning, ISAF will need to batten down the hatches in preparation for a Tornado of protest from the multihull world, as the catamaran lost out by two votes. It lost out to the Men’s Keelboat, aka the Star, the class that just refuses to lay down and die.

In the vote for the final women’s class, the votes went 21:20 in favour of Women’s Match Racing, the Women’s High Performance skiff just losing out by the skinniest of margins.

Once again, after a promising discussion and series of votes by the Events Committee two days ago, ISAF Council goes its own way. The wrong way.

But more of that later, I’ve got a plane to catch. In the mean time, I don’t doubt you’ll let me know how you feel about ISAF’s choices in the Comments section below…

If you’re interested, here is the breakdown of the votes as listed by ISAF. In total there were 36 ballot papers (two Council members did not vote after declaring a conflict of interest, and the President saved his vote in the case of a tie).

The results of the vote were:

Men – top six events selected

One person dinghy – Men (36 votes)
Windsurfer – Men (35 votes)
Two person dinghy – Men (34 votes)
Two person dinghy high performance – Men (34 votes)
One person dinghy heavy – Men (33 votes)
Keelboat – Men (23 votes)
Multihull – Men or Open (21 votes)

Women – top four events selected

One person dinghy – Women (35 votes)
Windsurfer – Women (34 votes)
Two person dinghy – Women (31 votes)
Keelboat match racing – Women (21 votes)
Two person dinghy high performance – Women (20 votes)
Multihull – Women (3 votes)

The ISAF President said, “Congratulations to the ten events which have been selected. With the introduction of the ISAF Women’s Match Racing World Championship and the ISAF Nations Cup we have seen a massive growth in women’s match racing and I am delighted and excited to welcome it on to the Olympic programme. I extend my thanks to the multihull which has been on the Olympic programme from 1976 to 2004 – we are sorry to have to say goodbye to such an old friend.”

Responses

Once again the losing side is sailing, i, as a sailor do not understand why boats that no one sails are staying in the olympic games, how countries in the world have national championships of keelboats? how many people sail in them?

no multihull, no high performance dinghy for women, is this promoting sailing? or protecting some lobbies? today is a sad day for sailing!

By doing this, and failing to see reality, what we are risking is having no sailing at all in the future, at olympic level. In a time where races are being changed to be more tv friendly, what we decide? bring boring old boats that attract no one. Sure sailing a star is a huge challenge, i know i sail one, but its not the some as sailing a tornado at full speed, i am sailor, i will watch any bit of tv with sail on it…but the rest of us? star? women match racing? shame on you ISAF!!!!!!!!

I remember the captain of the English rugby team - Will Carling - criticising the RFU powers that be. I believe he called them “…..boring old F***s…..” for the way they influenced a game that had changed hugely since they graced a rugby pitch. Given the outcome of the ISAF meeting I believe that all those women who would like the challenge of sailing a relatively inexpensive one design high performance skiff would be more than justified in using a similar description for the ISAF council for whom I do not doubt it has been a good few years since they hung off a trapeze in a force 5. I personally would like to know who voted for what. Could make very interesting reading!

J’aimerai savoir exactement qui a voté quoi dans ce résultat honteux. Etait-ce un vote secret ?
Si les Jeux Olympiques ne représentent ni la réalité de la voile d’aujourd’hui, ni les séries les plus populaires, ni les séries les plus performantes, alors à quoi servent-ils ?

Voici sans doute un nouvel exemple du conservatisme affligeant des élites vieillissantes.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories