Posted by: Andy Rice | 20 December 2007

Pressure building for an ISAF Revote

A letter from outgoing ISAF president Arve Sundheim to members of ISAF Council suggests there is unlikely to be a reconsideration of the Olympic events vote taken in Estoril back in early November.

Click here to download a pdf of the letter: isaf-sundheimresponse11dec07.pdf

Sundheim defends the voting procedure and claims that ISAF paid due consideration to the IOC’s requirements.

But pressure is building from national authorities to get a revote next May at the ISAF mid-year meeting in Qingdao. Following Yachting Australia’s and the Royal Yachting Association’s open requests for a revote, Yachting New Zealand is now also looking to do the same, according to a report on Sail World.

The YNZ statement says: “The Board of Yachting New Zealand has resolved to make a submission to the ISAF mid-year meeting requesting that the Events slate for the 2012 Olympic Games be revisited.

“The Board consulted with the Olympic Committee and the High Performance Committee on the matter and made the decision to make such a submission based on the longer term view of the future of sailing at the Olympics rather than the specific medal opportunities at the 2012 Games.”

Hallelujah! Sense prevails after all. Well done to the YNZ board members for being big enough to shift their stance to a more strategic vision rather than the self-serving approach of a few months ago.

Talking of strategy, that is the point that Rod Carr wanted to get across when I spoke to the RYA chief exec earlier today. “We want to see ISAF getting away from ‘sticking plaster’ politics and taking a more strategic approach to the future of the sport,” he said.

“That’s why we’re doing what we’re doing. Even if ISAF said ‘match racing is part of our strategy’, we might not agree with it but we would at least go along with it, if that was part of a strategy that had been properly thought through.”

Carr has had a number of conversations with other national authorities behind the scenes, and is confident that sufficient momentum is building towards a revote next May. Among other nations that are believed to have written to ISAF are Canada, Spain, Austria and Singapore. A few others, like France, have yet to decide whether or not to follow suit.

Meanwhile, the members of the ISAF Athletes Commission are weighing up the possibility of running a questionnaire of all the competitors in the 2008 Olympic class World Championships, most of which are taking place in Australia or New Zealand in the next two months.

If they go ahead with this, it will be interesting to see how Olympic sailors themselves would choose the classes for 2012. We had some indication of that in the SailJuice survey a few weeks ago, although the sample of Olympic sailors was perhaps not sufficient to draw any hard conclusions.

By the way, I’m running an interview with the chairwoman of the Athletes Commission in my newsletter which I’ll be publishing later today. As winner of the past three 470 World Championships, Dutch sailor Marcelien de Koning is arguably the most talented female Olympic sailor currently competing. She has some fascinating insights into teamwork, and believes that sometimes it’s better for a woman to think like a man.

Wow! She could say that, I couldn’t possibly comment!

If you want to find out what Marcelien means, sign up to my SailingTalk Xpress newsletter here, or via the ‘Newsletter’ menu tab at the top of this page.

Responses

Just read that letter and found the need to find out what universality means googling it found the following

Universality is the quality ascribed to an entity whose existence is consistent throughout the universe. In philosophy, universalism is a doctrine or school in which it is claimed that universal facts can be discovered and which is understood then as being in opposition to relativism……

and on it went…..

also I found this ;

Universality (medieval history)

Ah now we see its the ioc how want the historical classes !

Interesting that ISAF have issued no statement to the Yachting press that would show an acknowledgement of the wave of feeling against their decision. I wonder how many democratically elected bodies can get away without a response to howls of outrage? Even blair wasn’t THAT arrogant. What’s going on Andy???? Has the new telegraph line to ISAF HQ been sabotaged? Is the Pony Express on a month of industrial action? Are the great and the good so far removed from the groundswell that they need their attention drawn to the general feeling by an aide or intermediary? How do we communicate with these lofty ole men? It must be very blue to start 2008 in the rarified atmosphere of quite such a tall ivory tower. I think we all need to heat it for them! Happy 2008 to you, and please try to act the prince and kiss the isaf frog to wake the sods up. Answers on a postcard please……….etc.

ISAF is trying to stonewall the issue and prefer talking with civilized representatives of MNAs, not the howling mob at the gates with torches and pitchforks. Until the heat becomes unbearable or some decisions are made, there will be no statements from ISAF. What can they say? Not much.

HA!! Exactly - the howling mob at the gates are THE PEOPLE who “elected” them (although the electoral process is vague as presumably only ISAF members can elect them - do they represent the hordes of the great unwashed?). As such the civilised MNAs will be the buffer. Shrewd words from one so young Prfhhh. Long live the revolution!!!! Happy New Year to all Comrades!

ISAF needs to revisit this vote. If they do not sailing as an Olympic sport will go the way of the past. As a young tornado sailor my hopes of going to the olympics are dashed. There is no class that comes close to the Tornado in my opinion. Where should I go? Other classes have clear options.

With intense pressure mounting from the Estroil vote, ISAF has seriously called into question its own ability to govern effectively. Governments often have to make unpopular decisions no doubt. BUT those decisions ALWAYS show a care for there own well being. This vote can be intuited as wanting to end sailing as an Olympic Sport by 2012.

All Olympic class sailors irrespective of class need to unite and voice joint consent for a serious revision of the vote. If not for the current generation of sailors then for future ones.

Tidying up the loft I came across Bob Fisher’s report in Yachts and Yachting of the 1996 Conference and the boat selection…

Firstly then President Paul Henderson announced that the events picked the previous year (remember that’s what we’ve just had) were not binding!! Then he got the first meeting of Council to instruct the Events committee to include one of the Torbole Trials boats on its slate!

The big shenanigans happened in the Events committee… Firstly they selected the 49er, leaving all else unchanged… The next vote was that only classes in the previous Olympics should be selected for the remaining slots (thus ditching the Hobie 16 campaign). The next vote was for the two boards and the Europe to be nodded through. Next, and Fisher notes without any corroboratory evidence, Tom Ehman (USA rep) made the now notorious statement that 25% of the worlds sailors were in multihulls, and the Tornado went through, followed shortly after by the Soling. You’ll note that at this stage 6 classes from 10 have been picked…

With 5 classes left, 2 470s, Laser, Finn and Star, one had to go. So now they went to a “vote which one to chuck” vote, in which everyone votes for the class they want least, and the class with the least votes goes through, then repeat again until the odd man is left out. Are you with me still?

In round 1 the Laser went through, round 2 the Women’s 470, round three the Finn, and then in the fight for the last place the mens 470 got the least votes and went onto the events commitee slate…

This slate went back to Council. Politicking was attempted, but somewhat railroaded ouit, one suspects by Mr Henderson… They first took a vote on whether the 49er was in or not, which passed by a mile, and then a vote was proposed to accepy the rest of the events committee as a bunch, to the dismay of the Star Lobby I suspect… This was then passed 25-10, and the Star was out.

In an interview in the Mag Henderson unashamedly admits that the 49er was pushed through, and that he had worked the system appreciably to get the events commitee slate through Council…

I don’t think anyone can really contest that the above voting and processes were anything other than totally slanted and that the Tornado was a significant beneficiary…

Now we know now that the next thing that happened was that the IOC gave sailing an 11th medal, and somehow that got allocated to the Star (at the time the report was written one was being negotiated for Women’s match racing so goodness knows how that came about!)

At the time though the response of the Star sailors is interesting. It was certainly bewildered and bitter, but it conspiciously lacks the venom and spite coming from the Catamaran lobby, even though its quite obvious that things were handled in a far more unfair manner than this time…

So things are by no means over for the catamarn, but they really need to rethink their approach to this…

On a slightly differnt topic, having read the IOC reports on sports, and compared Sailings strengths and weaknesses as listed with other water sports, then I really don’t think exciting boats and TV coverage is the big problem for sailing in the Olympics. The problem is a very low participation in numbers of countries, and especially a desperate participation rate from Africa. I see skiffs, multihulls and keelboats as being all equally irrelevant to solving that problem…

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories